Pakistan's Reservations on The Rome Statute: A Critical Analysis from Legal and Political Perspectives

Authors

  • Naveed-ur- Rehman Assistant Professor, University Law College, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Amir Mahmood Chaudhry Visiting Faculty, University Law College, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Farooq Umair Niazi Assistant Professor, University Law College, University of the Punjab, Lahore Punjab, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56976/rjsi.v6i2.244

Keywords:

International, Legal, Pakistan, Political, Rome

Abstract

Pakistan has ratified seven out of nine significant international conventions on human rights. The country strongly supported the establishment of the International Criminal Court and voted in favour of the Rome Statute. However, the country has not ratified the Rome Statute and has expressed its reservations, which inter alia, include more immunity for the head of state, jurisdictional triggers initiated by the UN Security Council, and the doctrine of command responsibility. These reservations are considered a compromise on the state's sovereignty and jurisdiction. This article critically analyzes the reasons why Pakistan did not ratify the Rome Statute. The article further explores the country’s legislative framework embedded in the Constitution that enables it to ratify international treaties, the role of the Parliament, and the Ratification of International Treaties Act, 2013, which formalizes the procedure and grounds for ratification or non-ratification of international treaties. This study also critically examines the political and legal implications of non-ratification of the Rome Statute. The ratification of the Rome Statute by Pakistan may significantly impact the country's good ties with other nations, military and government relations, the country’s GSP Plus status, and domestic legislation following Islamic injunctions. The result of this study suggests that the country must adopt a balanced approach to ratifying the Rome Statute while considering the crucial aspects of state sovereignty, and carefully considering the legal, political, and strategic perspectives involved in such ratification

References

Adigun, M. (2021). The Principle of Complementarity: A Reflection on Its Meaning, Origin and Types in International Criminal Law. African Journal of International and Comparative Law, 29(1). https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/abs/10.3366/ajicl.2021.0351?journalCode=ajicl.

Ahmad, S., Rabbi, F., & Riaz, A. (2022). Implementation and Incorporation of International Treaties into Domestic Law of Pakistan: A Case Study of International Space Law Treaties. Global Legal Studies Review, 7(1), 67-73. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363301778.

Ajmal, A., & Rasool, F. (2023a). Insanity Defense in Blasphemy Offences in Pakistan. Global Social Sciences Review, 8(1), 447-453. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2023(VIII-I).41

Ajmal, A., & Rasool, F. (2023b). Transgender Rights Law in Pakistan: Mental Health Perspective. Global Social Sciences Review (GSSR), 8(2), 420-426. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2023(VIII-II).38

Ajmal, A., & Rasool, F. (2024a). Analysis of Doctrine of Insanity Defense in English Criminal Law. Research Journal for Societal Issues, 6(1), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.56976/rjsi.v6i1.181

Ajmal, A., & Rasool, F. (2024b). Analysis of the Law of Insanity Defense in the United Arab Emirates. Annals of Human and Social Sciences, 5(2), 405-412. http://doi.org/10.35484/ahss.2024(5-II-S)38

Ajmal, A., Rasool, F., & Niazi, F. U. (2023). Insanity defense in US law: A critical analysis. Journal of Development and Social Sciences, 4(4), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2023(4-IV)24

Amanullah, R. (2023). Article 70 of Constitution of Pakistan – Introduction and Passing of Bills. PK Wisdom. Retrieved from: https://pkwisdom.com/article-70-of-constitution-of-pakistan/.

Article 13(b) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, (2002).

Article 227 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, (1973).

Article 248, the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, (1973).

Article 27 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, (2002).

Article 28 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, (2002).

Articles 29 and 31 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, (1961).

Baker, A. (2019). The failure of the International Criminal Court (ICC). Institute for Contemporary Affairs 19(19). Retrieved from: https://jcpa.org/article/the-failure-of-the-international-criminal-court-icc.

Bharadwaj, A. (2003). International Criminal Court and the Question of Sovereignty. Strategic Analysis: A Monthly Journal of the IDSA, 27(1). https://ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu/olj/sa/sa_jan03bha01.html.

Business Recorder, (5 February, 2010). Doctrine of 'sovereign immunity. Retrieved from: https://www.brecorder.com/news/3727861/doctrine-of-sovereign-immunity-201002051016246.

Carter, L. E. (2010). The Principle of Complementarity and the International Criminal Court: The Role of Ne Bis in Idem. Santa Clara Journal of International Law, 8, 165.

Cheruiyot, A. (2014). How the International Criminal Court has failed in Africa? Thesis submitted to Kabarak University.

Dawn, (29 September, 2003). Pakistan unlikely to ink Rome Statute of ICC. Retrieved from: https://www.dawn.com/news/117634/pakistan-unlikely-to-ink-rome-statute-of-icc.

Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium, Arrest Warrant of April 11, 2000 (Judgment), ICJ Rep 3, 54 (2002).

Extraordinary Session of the Assembly of the African Union, Decision on Africa’s Relationship with the International Criminal Court (ICC). AU Doc Ext/Assembly/AU/Dec.1, para 5. (October 2013).

Ezennia, C. N. (2014). Application of the State Immunity Rule in the International Criminal Justice System: Problems Arising and a Critique of Legal Response Mechanisms. Retrieved from:https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=llm_theses.

Galand, A. S. (2019). Chapter 2 Article 13 (b) vs State Sovereignty, In UN Security Council Referrals to the International Criminal Court, 47–103. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004342217_004.

Ghouri, A. (2019). Democratising Foreign Policy: Parliamentary Oversight of Treaty Ratification in Pakistan. LUMS Law Journal, 6, 35-49.

Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, (2019). Pakistan's International Legal Obligations: A Human Rights Perspective. Retrieved from: https://hrcp-web.org/hrcpweb/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/2019-Pakistan_s-international-legal-obligations_-A-human-rights-perspective-EN.pdf

Jackson, M. & Arnold, A., (2021). Article 28: Responsibility of Commanders and other Superiors. Retrieved from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4176909

Jamshedi, M. (2013). The enforcement gap: How the International Criminal Court failed in Darfur. Al Jazeera. Retrieved from: https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2013/3/25/the-enforcement-gap-how-the-international-criminal-court-failed-in-darfur.

Kanwel, S. et al. (2024). Crimes against Humanity: A Human Rights Perspective. Journal of Asian Development Studies, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.62345/jads.2024.13.1.2.

Khan, A. M. (6 November, 2023). Constitution or no Constitution? Dawn. https://www.dawn.com/news/1786871.

Khan, H., (2005). Constitutional and Political History of Pakistan. Oxford University Press.

Khan, M. A. (2019). Pakistan’s Commitment to Human Rights: A Probe into the Question of Ratification of the Rome Statute of International Criminal Court. Review of Human Rights, 5(1), 55-77. https://doi.org/10.35994/rhr.v5i1.133.

Khan. K. R. (2014). International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. International Judicial Academy, Washington, D.C., with assistance from the American Society of International Law. Spring 2014 Issue. Retrieved from: http://www.judicialmonitor.org/archive_spring2014/justiceinprofile.html.

Klobucista, C. & Ferragamo, M. (2023). The Role of the International Criminal Court. Retrieved from: https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/role-international-criminal-court.

Laden, M. T. (2013). An Overview of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Jurisdiction and Complementarity Principle and Issues in Domestic Implementation in Nigeria. Afe Babalola University. Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy, 1(1), 37-53.

Lahiri, D. (1998). Additional Secretary, Ministry of External Affairs, India, spoke on adopting the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court on July 17, 1998. Retrieved from: http://www.un.org/icc/speeches.

Malik, A., (20 August, 2022). Pakistan, GSP+, and the International Criminal Court. Pakistan Politico. Retrieved from: https://pakistanpolitico.com/icc/.

Pedretti, R. (2013). Immunity of Heads of State and State Officials for International Crimes.

Philippe, X. (2006). The Principles of Universal Jurisdiction and Complementarity: How Do the Two Principles Intermesh? International Review of the Red Cross, 88(862), 22-39. https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/assets/files/other/irrc_862_philippe.pdf.

Press Release. (1998). Chairman of Committee of the Whole of Rome Conference Tells Legal Committee States Should Be Open to Dialogue on Concerns about ICC Statute. UN GA/L/3079. https://press.un.org/en/1998/19981022.gal3079.html.

Prosecutor v. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta (Notice of withdrawal of charges against Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta) ICC-01/09-02/11-983 (December 5, 2014).

Rabbi, F. et al., (2022). Implementation and Incorporation of International Treaties into Domestic Law of Pakistan: A Case Study of International Space Law Treaties. Global Legal Studies Review, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.31703/glsr.2022(VII-I).09.

Section 33, Disobedience of lawful command, The Army Act, (1952).

Section 4(2), Ratification Treaties Act, (2013).

Section 4, Ratification of International Treaties Act, (2013).

Section 5(2), Ratification of International Treaties Act, (2013).

Section 5(3), Ratification of International Treaties Act, (2013).

Shahzad, H. (29 August, 2023). Pakistan's Role in UN Peacekeeping: Contributions, Challenges, and Future Prospects. Retrieved from: https://issi.org.pk/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/IB_Hoorain_Aug_29_2023.pdf.

Singhi, Y. (2021). Head of State immunity: The ICC’s biggest impediment. Indian Journal of International Law, 59, 391–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40901-020-00118-9.

Sliedregt, E. (2009). Article 28 of the ICC Statute: Mode of Liability and Separate Offense? New Criminal Law Review 12(3), 420-438.

Sufi, A. B. (10 December, 2009). Pakistan and Rome Statute. Retrieved from: https://www.dawn.com/news/507667/www.tupernic.com.

United Nations, (19 May, 2009). Seminar on International Criminal Justice: The Role of the International Criminal Court. International Criminal Court publication. ISBN No. 92-9227-144-X. https://asp.icc-cpi.int/sites/asp/files/asp_docs/Publications/ASP-PUB-PoA-Sem2009-ENG.pdf

Wierczyńska, K. (2022). International Prosecutors Acting before National Courts? The Rome Statute System and the Ultimate Approach to Positive Complementarity. Chinese Journal of International Law, 21(2), 259-285. https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmac012.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

Rehman, N.- ur-., Chaudhry, A. M. ., & Niazi, F. U. . (2024). Pakistan’s Reservations on The Rome Statute: A Critical Analysis from Legal and Political Perspectives. Research Journal for Societal Issues, 6(2), 592–604. https://doi.org/10.56976/rjsi.v6i2.244

Issue

Section

Articles