State’s Efforts to Ensure Social Inclusion of PWDs: Theory and Practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56976/rjsi.v6i2.236Keywords:
Disability, Inclusion, Accessibility, UNCRPD, Human Rights, DiscriminationAbstract
The study under review discusses the multifaceted challenges and underlines the societal attitudes that bars the social inclusion of persons with disabilities (PWDs) in Pakistan’s socio-political and socio-cultural context. The domain of disability rights is very complicated to define as in our society most of the time the PWDs are treated as the disabled ones rather instead of a productive human resource with diversity. The prevailing social attitude treats the PWDs with sympathy and considers them for charity as a general belief that charity to these people will benefit them on the day of judgement. Pakistan’s first disability-related legislation ‘The disabled People (Employment and Rehabilitation) Ordinance 1981 concentrates on medical treatment and rehabilitation. However, later on, successive governments have taken several measures such as signing and ratifying the UNCRPD, amending the law, enhancing the quota, establishing councils, introducing training opportunities, and introducing subsidies on local transport, railway and air tickets, and free education. This research study highlights the factors that are preventing the social inclusion of PWDs and increasing their vulnerability to living on the margins of their lives. Simultaneously, the study discusses multiple dimensions that are imperative for PWDs’ dignity in society and steps to ensure social inclusion as accord to the international framework of disability rights.
References
Ahmed, S. U., Ali, A., Memon, A. H., & Hussain, A. (2021). Policy framework for implementation of sustainable procurement practices in healthcare industry. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 3929-3945.
Ali, A., Audi, M., Nisar, S., & Senturk, I. (2021). Determinants of public procurement efficiency: A comprehensive study of public procurement rules of Punjab, Pakistan.
AlNuaimi, B. K., Khan, M., & Ajmal, M. M. (2021). The role of big data analytics capabilities in greening e-procurement: A higher order PLS-SEM analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 169, 120808.
Alvarez-Rodríguez, J. M., Labra-Gayo, J. E., & de Pablos, P. O. (2014). New trends on e-Procurement applying semantic technologies: Current status and future challenges. Computers in Industry, 65(5), 800-820.
Amann, M., Roehrich, J. K., Eßig, M., & Harland, C. (2014). Driving sustainable supply chain management in the public sector: The importance of public procurement in the European Union. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(3), 351-366.
Baltrunaite, A., Giorgiantonio, C., Mocetti, S., & Orlando, T. (2021). Discretion and supplier selection in public procurement. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 37(1), 134-166.
Bank, W. (2017). World development report 2017: Governance and the law. The World Bank.
Bartezzaghi, E., & Ronchi, S. (2003). Internet supporting the procurement process: lessons from four case studies. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 14(8), 632-641.
Bauhr, M., Czibik, Á., de Fine Licht, J., & Fazekas, M. (2020). Lights on the shadows of public procurement: Transparency as an antidote to corruption. Governance, 33(3), 495-523.
Bosio, E., Djankov, S., Glaeser, E., & Shleifer, A. (2022). Public procurement in law and practice. American Economic Review, 112(4), 1091-1117.
Burki, S. J., Najam, S., & Butt, A. E. (2018). Smart Procurement, Supply Chain and Distribution of Medicines at Government Health Facilities.
Chekol, G. A., & Tehulu, T. A. (2014). Public procurement reform in Ethiopia: Factors leading to effective public procurement implementation: The case of Amhara Region. European Journal of Business and Management, 6(23), 153-158.
Cheng, W., Appolloni, A., D'Amato, A., & Zhu, Q. (2018). Green Public Procurement, missing concepts and future trends–A critical review. Journal of cleaner production, 176, 770-784.
Čudanov, M., Jovanović, P., & Jaško, O. (2018). Influence of the Public Procurement Procedure Type on the Duration of Public Procurement. Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government, 16(2).
Curado, A., Damásio, B., Encarnação, S., Candia, C., & Pinheiro, F. L. (2021). Scaling behavior of public procurement activity. Plos one, 16(12), e0260806.
Edler, J., & Uyarra, E. (2013). Public procurement of innovation. In Handbook of innovation in public services (pp. 224-237). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Edler, J., & Yeow, J. (2016). Connecting demand and supply: The role of intermediation in public procurement of innovation. Research policy, 45(2), 414-426.
Engelhardt, M. A. (2017). Hitching healthcare to the chain: An introduction to blockchain technology in the healthcare sector. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(10).
Fazekas, M., & Kocsis, G. (2020). Uncovering high-level corruption: cross-national objective corruption risk indicators using public procurement data. British Journal of Political Science, 50(1), 155-164.
Gascó, M., Cucciniello, M., Nasi, G., & Yuan, Q. (2018). Determinants and barriers of e-procurement: A European comparison of public sector experiences.
Gavurová, B., Mikeska, M., & Huculova, E. (2020). Evaluation of selected determinants of public procurement in the health sector. Administratie si Management Public.
Georghiou, L., Edler, J., Uyarra, E., & Yeow, J. (2014). Policy instruments for public procurement of innovation: Choice, design and assessment. Technological forecasting and social change, 86, 1-12.
Grandia, J., & Voncken, D. (2019). Sustainable public procurement: The impact of ability, motivation, and opportunity on the implementation of different types of sustainable public procurement. Sustainability, 11(19), 5215.
Gunasekara, H. G., Sridarran, P., & Rajaratnam, D. (2022). Effective use of blockchain technology for facilities management procurement process. Journal of Facilities Management, 20(3), 452-468.
Kajimbwa, M. A. (2023). Public Procurement and Performance. In Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (pp. 10837-10842). Springer.
Kakwezi, P., & Nyeko, S. (2019). Procurement processes and performance: Efficiency and effectiveness of the procurement function. International Journal of Social Sciences Management and Entrepreneurship (IJSSME), 3(1).
Kapkama, J. Y. (2018). Effect of E-Procurement on Lead Time in the Public Health Sector in Kenya: A Case of Public Health Facilities in Nairobi County. Journal of International Business, Innovation and Strategic Management, 1(4), 104-125.
Kilbourne, A. M., Beck, K., Spaeth‐Rublee, B., Ramanuj, P., O'Brien, R. W., Tomoyasu, N., & Pincus, H. A. (2018). Measuring and improving the quality of mental health care: a global perspective. World psychiatry, 17(1), 30-38.
Kirillova, O. Y., & Lantsova, O. V. (2019). Increasing the Efficiency of Procurement Processes as a Result of Implementing Category Management. Vestnik Volgogradskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Serii︠a︡ 3, Ėkonomika, Ėkologii︠a︡, 21(3).
Kristensen, H. S., Mosgaard, M. A., & Remmen, A. (2021). Circular public procurement practices in Danish municipalities. Journal of cleaner production, 281, 124962.
Lakhani, A. A., & Maqbul, M. (2024). Impact of e-procurement on the cost of manufacturing firms in Pakistan. South Asian Journal of Operations and Logistics, 3(2), 152-167.
Lăzăroiu, G., Ionescu, L., Uță, C., Hurloiu, I., Andronie, M., & Dijmărescu, I. (2020). Environmentally responsible behavior and sustainability policy adoption in green public procurement. Sustainability, 12(5), 2110.
Millington, K., & Bhardwaj, M. (2017). Evidence and experience of procurement in health sector decentralisation. K4D Helpdesk Report.
Modrusan, N., Rabuzin, K., & Mrsic, L. (2020). Improving Public Sector Efficiency using Advanced Text Mining in the Procurement Process. DATA,
Montalbán-Domingo, L., García-Segura, T., Sanz, M. A., & Pellicer, E. (2018). Social sustainability criteria in public-work procurement: An international perspective. Journal of cleaner production, 198, 1355-1371.
NADEEM, S (2017). Sustainable Procurement Behaviour In Public Service: The Impact Of Green Organisational Culture And Commitment Towards Change.
Nemec, J., Kubák, M., Donin, G., & Kotherová, Z. (2021). Efficiency of public procurement in the Czech and Slovak health care sectors. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 17(62), 115-133.
Nikolaevna, O. I., & Aleksandrovich, K. A. (2021). Improving the procurement process in the corporation. AIP Conference Proceedings,
Odhiambo, A. C., & Theuri, F. S. (2015). Effects of Public procurement Processes on organization Performance. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 5(9), 1-5.
Radanović, I., & Likić, R. (2018). Opportunities for use of blockchain technology in medicine. Applied health economics and health policy, 16, 583-590.
Radell, C., & Schannon, D. (2019). Digital procurement: The benefits go far beyond efficiency. Supply Chain Management Review, 6, 14-21.
Roehrich, J. K., Lewis, M. A., & George, G. (2014). Are public–private partnerships a healthy option? A systematic literature review. Social science & medicine, 113, 110-119.
Rolfstam, M. (2013). Public procurement and innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Schäfer, D., Stephan, A., & Fuhrmeister, S. (2024). The impact of public procurement on financial barriers to general and green innovation. Small Business Economics, 62(3), 939-959.
Siwandeti, M., Sanga, C., & Panga, F. (2021). Technological factors influencing vendors’ participation in public electronic procurement system in Ilala, Tanzania. East Africa Journal of Social and Applied Sciences (EAJ-SAS), 3(1).
Sönnichsen, S. D., & Clement, J. (2020). Review of green and sustainable public procurement: Towards circular public procurement. Journal of cleaner production, 245, 118901.
Szucs, F. (2024). Discretion and favoritism in public procurement. Journal of the European Economic Association, 22(1), 117-160.
Tawfiq, A. (2020). The effect of disruptive factors on inventory control as a mediator and organizational performance in Health Department of Punjab, Pakistan. Policy, 9(2), 122-134.
Testa, F., Annunziata, E., Iraldo, F., & Frey, M. (2016). Drawbacks and opportunities of green public procurement: an effective tool for sustainable production. Journal of cleaner production, 112, 1893-1900.
Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., & Morner, M. (2015). Public–private partnerships in the health care sector: a systematic review of the literature. Public Management Review, 17(2), 236-261.
Uyarra, E., Edler, J., Garcia-Estevez, J., Georghiou, L., & Yeow, J. (2014). Barriers to innovation through public procurement: A supplier perspective. Technovation, 34(10), 631-645.
Uyarra, E., Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M., Flanagan, K., & Magro, E. (2020). Public procurement, innovation and industrial policy: Rationales, roles, capabilities and implementation. Research Policy, 49(1), 103844.
Vaidya, K., & Campbell, J. (2016). Multidisciplinary approach to defining public e-procurement and evaluating its impact on procurement efficiency. Information Systems Frontiers, 18, 333-348.
Van Winden, W., & Carvalho, L. (2019). Intermediation in public procurement of innovation: How Amsterdam’s startup-in-residence programme connects startups to urban challenges. Research Policy, 48(9), 103789.
Wibowo, R. (2019). Impact of procurement professionalization on the efficiency of public procurement. Operations Excellence: Journal of Applied Industrial Engineering, 11(3), 228.
Yakovlev, A., Tkachenko, A., Demidova, O., & Balaeva, O. (2015). The impacts of different regulatory regimes on the effectiveness of public procurement. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(11), 796-814.
Zaidi, S. A. M., Ashraf, S., & Shah, S. A. A. The Public Procurement System in Pakistan: A Critical Analysis.
Zhu, Q., Geng, Y., & Sarkis, J. (2013). Motivating green public procurement in China: An individual level perspective. Journal of environmental management, 126, 85-95.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Batool Hasan, Muhammad Arslan, Rimsha Aziz, Ghazala Waheed
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
