Analysis of the Transformation of Residential Open Spaces from Center of Activities to Empty Enclosures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56976/rjsi.v6i1.185Abstract
This research paper looks at four factors resulting in transformation of residential open space specifically the courtyard, from centre of activities to empty enclosures. These factors are historical, cultural, society and gender. Predominantly this research looks at residential space in Lahore from a feminist perspective; tracing and analysing it from a gender based socio-cultural aspect of connectivity to individuality. Rapid social and demographic changes are resulting in a new future of residential architecture in our part of the world, leading to cultural changes where globalization is one of the major factors. The structure has evolved overtime from a traditional joint family unit to a nuclear family unit which is a major shift resulting from this phenomenon. A qualitative research approach using purposive sampling method was employed. The findings highlight the importance of these open and semi covered spaces towards a healthy and connected social life fostering activities of relaxation.
References
Ali, N. I. (2015). The Pakistani Courtyard House: A Comparative Study Of Spatial Configurations Using Syntactical Analysis M.Sc. Istanbul Technical University, Graduate School Of Science Engineering And Technology, 151(May), 10–17.
Ayafei, A. M. A. (2020). The Revival of Courtyard Houses in Qatar: A Policy Development Attempts (Doctoral dissertation, Hamad Bin Khalifa University (Qatar)).
Ahmad, N. (1869). Mirat-ul-Aroos Ali, N. (2022). Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/ 90345803/The_Pakistani_Courtyard_House_A_Comparative_Study_Of_Spatial_Configurations_Using_Syntactical_Analysis
Bhatti, Z. S., & Hawkes, P. W. (2018). Understanding traditional domestic buildings in Pakistan: Lessons for contemporary design. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
Ali, N. I. (2015). The Pakistani Courtyard House: A Comparative Study of Spatial Configurations Using Syntactical Analysis. m.sc. Istanbul technical university, graduate school of science engineering and technology.
Carter, A. K. (2022). Building from the ground up: The archaeology of residential spaces and communities in Southeast Asia. Journal of Archaeological Research, 31(1), 1–54. doi:10.1007/s10814-021-09170-4
Fast, K. (2021). The disconnection turn: Three facets of disconnective work in post-digital capitalism. Convergence, 27(6), 1615-1630.
Glover, W., (2007). Making Lahore Modern
Hanif, S., Ahmad, S. T., & Saleem, S. S. (2015). The need to build upwards: A study on perception of vertical/apartment housing among middle income group of Lahore. Vidyabharati International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 4(2), 39-57.
Hartig, T. 2008. ‘‘Green Space, Psychological Restoration, and Health Inequality.’’ The Lancet 372:1614–15
Husain, F. (2024). The Stigma Matrix: Gender, Globalization, and the Agency of Pakistan's Frontline Women. Stanford University Press.
Jankiraman, M. (2020). Perspectives in Indian History: From the Origins to AD 1857. Notion Press.
Khan, M. (1994). Cultural Transfers: The Repossession of Architectural Form. Environmental Design: Journal of the Islamic Environmental Design Research Centre, 1(2), 84-103.
Kent, J. L., & Thompson, S. (2014). The Three Domains of Urban Planning for Health and Well-being. Journal of Planning Literature, 29(3), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0885412214520712
Küçükergin, F. N., Dedeoğlu, B. B., & Öztürk, Y. (2024). How does social change encourage or discourage the support for the development of Cittaslow?. Cities, 145, 104721.
Shehan, C. L., & Duncan, M. (2016). The wiley blackwell encyclopedia of family studies. Chicester: Wiley Blackwell.
López, X. P. S. (2020). Defining and theorizing place-based communities in the era of globalization. RIPS, 19(2), 107-120.
Malmberg, G. (2021). Time and space in international migration. In International migration, immobility and development (pp. 21-48). Routledge.
Marek, L., Hobbs, M., Wiki, J., Kingham, S., & Campbell, M. (2021). The good, the bad, and the environment: developing an area-based measure of access to health-promoting and health-constraining environments in New Zealand. International Journal of Health Geographics, 20, 1-20.
Stolley, K. S. (2005). The Basics of Sociology. In Reference Reviews (Vol. 19, Issue 8). https://doi.org/10.1108/09504120510632471
Krasilnikova, E., & Klimov, D. (2016). The main design principles of hybrid spaces in terms of the urban planning regeneration, (4), 63-74.
Massoud, B. (2020). “Patterns” of threshold spaces in the historical city of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, 197, 153-165.
Wagner, K. B. (2023). TikTok and its mediatic split: the promotion of ecumenical user-generated content alongside Sinocentric media globalization. Media, Culture & Society, 45(2), 323-337.
Tillotson, G. H. R. (1989). The tradition of Indian architecture: Continuity, controversy and change since 1850.
Tönnies, F. (2012). "Community and Society": From CP Loomis (ed.), Community and Society (1963)[1887]. The urban sociology reader (pp. 16-22). Routledge.
Townsend, M., and R. Weerasuriya. 2010. Beyond Blue to Green: The Benefits of Contact with Nature for Mental Health and Well-being. Melbourne, Australia: Beyond Blue.
Yogendrarajah, R. (2013). Women empowerment through decision making. Yogendrarajah, Rathiranee, (2013), Women Empowerment through Decision Making, The International Journal of Economics and Business Management, 3(1), 25-39.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Fatima Nasir Alvi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
