Leveraging Green Innovation to Foster Sustainable Development through Green Dynamic Capabilities

Authors

  • Naheed Shaban PhD Scholar, Lahore Business School, University of Lahore, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Talat Afza Professor, Lahore Business School, University of Lahore, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Sadaf Ehsan Assistant Professor, Department of Management Sciences, COMSATS University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Rizwan Qaiser Danish Associate Professor, Institute of Business Administration, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56976/rjsi.v6i3.264

Keywords:

Green Dynamic Capability, Green Innovation, Sustainable Development and Environmental Regulations

Abstract

Green dynamic capabilities are crucial for sustainable development and have gained substantial scholarly as well as practitioners’ attention. Given the escalating concerns about climate change, resource depletion, and environmental stress, companies must address ecological issues and promote green innovation. The literature emphasizes the role of environmental management practices, institutional pressures, and government regulations in driving green innovation. Despite this, there is a significant knowledge gap regarding the influence of GDCs on sustainable development through green innovation, especially with environmental regulations as a moderating factor in manufacturing firms. Effective use of GDCs can alleviate sustainability challenges such as pollution and resource depletion. This study aims to investigate the impact of GDCs on sustainable development via green innovation, moderated by environmental regulations, offering new insights into the interplay between green dynamic capabilities green innovation, and sustainable development within manufacturing firms in Pakistan.  Primary data through survey design was gathered from manufacturing firms publicly traded on Pakistan's stock exchange. After testing for assumptions, covariance-based structural equation modeling approach was used where measurement model and structural model were developed. The data validates the underlying factor structure, their loadings and then testing the proposed hypotheses for direct relation, mediation and moderation. The results indicate that green innovation mediates the impact of GDCs on sustainable development, with environmental regulations moderating the relationship between GDCs and green innovation. The findings present important implications for both theory and practice.

References

Abrudan, D. B., Rafi, N., Daianu, D. C., & Kalyar, M. N. (2022). Linking green intellectual capital with green innovation: Examining the roles of green dynamic capabilities and'motivation to achieve legitimacy'. Agricultural Economics, 68(7), 250-258.

Ahmad, B., Shafique, I., Qammar, A., Ercek, M., & Kalyar, M. N. (2022). Prompting green product and process innovation: Examining the effects of green transformational leadership and dynamic capabilities. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1-13.

Akomea-Frimpong, I., Adeabah, D., Ofosu, D., & Tenakwah, E. J. (2021). A review of studies on green finance of banks, research gaps and future directions. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 1-24.

Akomea-Frimpong, I., Adeabah, D., Ofosu, D., & Tenakwah, E. J. (2022). A review of studies on green finance of banks, research gaps and future directions. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 12(4), 1241-1264.

Akter, N., Siddik, A., & Mondal, M. A. (2018). Sustainability reporting on green financing: A study of listed private sustainability reporting on green financing: A study of listed private commercial banks in Bangladesh. J. Bus. Technol, 12, 14-27.

Albort-Morant, G., Leal-Rodríguez, A. L., Fernández-Rodríguez, V., & Ariza-Montes, A. (2018). Assessing the origins, evolution and prospects of the literature on dynamic capabilities: A bibliometric analysis. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 24(1), 42-52.

Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in organizational behavior, 10(1), 123-167.

Amaranti, R., Govindaraju, R., & Irianto, D. (2019). Green dynamic capability for enhancing green innovations performance in a manufacturing company: a conceptual framework. Paper presented at the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering.

Aragon-Correa, J. A., Matıas-Reche, F., & Senise-Barrio, M. E. (2004). Managerial discretion and corporate commitment to the natural environment. Journal of Business Research, 57(9), 964-975.

Arshad, M., Yu, C. K., Qadir, A., & Rafique, M. (2023). The influence of climate change, green innovation, and aspects of green dynamic capabilities as an approach to achieving sustainable development. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-20.

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.

Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.

Bernadeta, I., Patworo, L. H., & Prapti, M. S. (2021). Green Dynamic Capability Analysis: Study on SME Sustainable Fashion in Semarang. Sustainable Competitive Advantage (SCA), 11(1).

Boubakri, N., Cosset, J.-C., & Saffar, W. (2013). The role of state and foreign owners in corporate risk-taking: Evidence from privatization. Journal of Financial Economics, 108(3), 641-658.

Brundtland, G. H. (1985). World commission on environment and development. Environmental policy and law, 14(1), 26-30.

Carmona-Lavado, A., Cuevas-Rodríguez, G., & Cabello-Medina, C. (2010). Social and organizational capital: Building the context for innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(4), 681-690.

Cezarino, L. O., Alves, M. F. R., Caldana, A. C. F., & Liboni, L. B. (2019). Dynamic capabilities for sustainability: Revealing the systemic key factors. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 32, 93-112.

Chen, Y.-S., & Chang, C.-H. (2013). The determinants of green product development performance: Green dynamic capabilities, green transformational leadership, and green creativity. Journal of business ethics, 116, 107-119.

Chen, Y.-S., Chang, T.-W., Lin, C.-Y., Lai, P.-Y., & Wang, K.-H. (2016). The influence of proactive green innovation and reactive green innovation on green product development performance: The mediation role of green creativity. Sustainability, 8(10), 966.

Cheng, C. C. (2020). Sustainability orientation, green supplier involvement, and green innovation performance: Evidence from diversifying green entrants. Journal of business ethics, 161, 393-414.

Chiou, T.-Y., Chan, H. K., Lettice, F., & Chung, S. H. (2011). The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(6), 822-836.

Chiu, Y.-B., & Lee, C.-C. (2020). Effects of financial development on energy consumption: The role of country risks. Energy Economics, 90, 104833.

Dangelico, R. M., Pujari, D., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2017). Green product innovation in manufacturing firms: A sustainability‐oriented dynamic capability perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 490-506.

Dean, T. J., & Brown, R. L. (1995). Pollution regulation as a barrier to new firm entry: Initial evidence and implications for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 288-303.

Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29, 1-19.

Diesendorf, M. (2000). Sustainability and sustainable development. Sustainability: The corporate challenge of the 21st century, 2, 19-37.

Dong, Z., Xu, H., Zhang, Z., Lyu, Y., Lu, Y., & Duan, H. (2022). Whether Green Finance Improves Green Innovation of Listed Companies—Evidence from China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17), 10882.

Donnellan, J., & Rutledge, W. L. (2019). A case for resource‐based view and competitive advantage in banking. Managerial and Decision Economics, 40(6), 728-737.

Esteves, A. M., Genus, A., Henfrey, T., Penha‐Lopes, G., & East, M. (2021). Sustainable entrepreneurship and the Sustainable Development Goals: Community‐led initiatives, the social solidarity economy and commons ecologies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(3), 1423-1435.

Foss, N. J. (1997). Resources, firms, and strategies: a reader in the resource-based perspective: Oxford University Press.

FUND, S. (2015). Sustainable development goals.

Goni, F. A., Gholamzadeh Chofreh, A., Estaki Orakani, Z., Klemeš, J. J., Davoudi, M., & Mardani, A. (2021). Sustainable business model: A review and framework development. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 23, 889-897.

Graafland, J., & Smid, H. (2017). Reconsidering the relevance of social license pressure and government regulation for environmental performance of European SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 967-977.

Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability… and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Accounting, organizations and society, 35(1), 47-62.

George, D., & Mallery, P. (2021). IBM SPSS statistics 27 step by step: A simple guide and reference. Routledge.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis.

Horbach, J. (2008). Determinants of environmental innovation—New evidence from German panel data sources. Research policy, 37(1), 163-173.

Hung, R. Y. Y., Yang, B., Lien, B. Y.-H., McLean, G. N., & Kuo, Y.-M. (2010). Dynamic capability: Impact of process alignment and organizational learning culture on performance. Journal of World Business, 45(3), 285-294.

Irfan, M., Razzaq, A., Sharif, A., & Yang, X. (2022). Influence mechanism between green finance and green innovation: Exploring regional policy intervention effects in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 182, 121882.

Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration (ijec), 11(4), 1-10.

King, A., (2000). Organizational response to environmental regulation: punctuated change or autogenesis? Business Strategy and the Environment, 9, 224e238.

Kareem, M. A., & Alameer, A. A. A. (2019). The impact of dynamic capabilities on organizational effectiveness. Management & Marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 14(4), 402-418.

Li, D., Zheng, M., Cao, C., Chen, X., Ren, S., & Huang, M. (2017). The impact of legitimacy pressure and corporate profitability on green innovation: Evidence from China top 100. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 41-49.

Li, H. (2022). Green innovation, green dynamic capability, and enterprise performance: evidence from heavy polluting manufacturing enterprises in China. Complexity, 2(1), 25-38.

Lin, Y.-H., & Chen, Y.-S. (2017). Determinants of green competitive advantage: the roles of green knowledge sharing, green dynamic capabilities, and green service innovation. Quality & Quantity, 51, 1663-1685.

López-Gamero, M. D., Molina-Azorín, J. F., & Claver-Cortés, E. (2010). The potential of environmental regulation to change managerial perception, environmental management, competitiveness and financial performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(10-11), 963-974.

Luan, N. T., Hau, D. N. D., & Thu, N. T. A. (2022). The Influence of Green Product Development Performance to Enhance Enterprise Effectiveness and Innovation. Economies, 10(5), 113.

Luo, Y., Salman, M., & Lu, Z. (2021). Heterogeneous impacts of environmental regulations and foreign direct investment on green innovation across different regions in China. Science of the total environment, 759, 143744.

Ma, L., Ali, A., Shahzad, M., & Khan, A. (2022). Factors of green innovation: The role of dynamic capabilities and knowledge sharing through green creativity. Kybernetes(ahead-of-print).

Meirun, T., Makhloufi, L., & Ghozali Hassan, M. (2020). Environmental outcomes of green entrepreneurship harmonization. Sustainability, 12(24), 10615.

Mensah, J. (2019). Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review. Cogent Social Sciences, 5(1), 1653531.

Muganyi, T., Yan, L., & Sun, H.-p. (2021). Green finance, fintech and environmental protection: Evidence from China. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 7, 100107.

Mulaessa, N., & Lin, L. (2021). How do proactive environmental strategies affect green innovation? The moderating role of environmental regulations and firm performance. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(17), 9083.

Naqvi, B., Mirza, N., Rizvi, S. K. A., Porada-Rochoń, M., & Itani, R. (2021). Is there a green fund premium? Evidence from twenty seven emerging markets. Global Finance Journal, 50, 100656.

Nassani, A. A., Javed, A., Radulescu, M., Yousaf, Z., Secara, C. G., & Tolea, C. (2022). Achieving Green Innovation in Energy Industry through Social Networks, Green Dynamic Capabilities, and Green Organizational Culture. Energies, 15(16), 5925.

Nazarenko, L. S., Tausnev, N., Russell, G. L., Rind, D., Miller, R. L., Schmidt, G. A., . . . Ackerman, A. S. (2022). Future Climate Change under SSP Emission Scenarios with GISS‐E2. 1. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 14(7), e2021MS002871.

Ouyang, X., Li, Q., & Du, K. (2020). How does environmental regulation promote technological innovations in the industrial sector? Evidence from Chinese provincial panel data. Energy Policy, 139, 111310.

Phrampus, B. J., & Hornbach, M. J. (2012). Recent changes to the Gulf Stream causing widespread gas hydrate destabilization. Nature, 490(7421), 527-530.

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). The big idea: Creating shared value. Harvard business review, 89(1), 2.

Porter, M.E., 1991. America's green strategy. Scientific American 264, 168.

Porter, M., Van der Linde, C., 1995. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9, 97e118.

Pulido-Velazquez, D., Renau-Pruñonosa, A., Llopis-Albert, C., Morell, I., Collados-Lara, A.-J., Senent-Aparicio, J., & Baena-Ruiz, L. (2018). Integrated assessment of future potential global change scenarios and their hydrological impacts in coastal aquifers–a new tool to analyse management alternatives in the Plana Oropesa-Torreblanca aquifer. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 22(5), 3053-3074.

Qiu, L., Jie, X., Wang, Y., & Zhao, M. (2020). Green product innovation, green dynamic capability, and competitive advantage: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 146-165.

Rao, P., & Holt, D. (2005). Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance? International journal of operations & production management.

Ray, G., Barney, J. B., & Muhanna, W. A. (2004). Capabilities, business processes, and competitive advantage: choosing the dependent variable in empirical tests of the resource‐based view. Strategic management journal, 25(1), 23-37.

Singh, S. K., Del Giudice, M., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., Latan, H., & Sohal, A. S. (2021). [Stakeholder pressure, green innovation, and performance in small and medium‐sized enterprises: The role of green dynamic capabilities]. 1.

Singh, S. K., Del Giudice, M., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., Latan, H., & Sohal, A. S. (2022). Stakeholder pressure, green innovation, and performance in small and medium‐sized enterprises: The role of green dynamic capabilities. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 500-514.

Song, W., & Yu, H. (2018). Green innovation strategy and green innovation: The roles of green creativity and green organizational identity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(2), 135-150.

Stanovcic, T., Pekovic, S., & Bouziri, A. (2015). The effect of knowledge management on environmental innovation: The empirical evidence from France. Baltic Journal of management, 10(4), 413-431.

Teece, D. J. (2014). The foundations of enterprise performance: Dynamic and ordinary capabilities in an (economic) theory of firms. Academy of management perspectives, 28(4), 328-352.

Teece, D. J. (2018). Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long range planning, 51(1), 40-49.

Tseng, M.-L., Chiu, A. S., Liu, G., & Jantaralolica, T. (2020). Circular economy enables sustainable consumption and production in multi-level supply chain system. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 154, 104601.

Ullah, H., Wang, Z., Mohsin, M., Jiang, W., & Abbas, H. (2022). Multidimensional perspective of green financial innovation between green intellectual capital on sustainable business: the case of Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(4), 5552-5568.

Wang, X. (2022). Research on the impact mechanism of green finance on the green innovation performance of China's manufacturing industry. Managerial and Decision Economics, 43(7), 2678-2703.

Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A Resource-‐Based View of the Firm, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5. Resource, firms, and Strategies.

Wing, L. C., & Jin, Z. (2015). Risk management methods applied to renewable and sustainable energy: a review. Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 3(1), 1-12.

Wong, S. K. S. (2013). Environmental requirements, knowledge sharing and green innovation: Empirical evidence from the electronics industry in China. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(5), 321-338.

Xu, X. (2023). Does green finance promote green innovation? Evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(10), 27948-27964.

Yang, Y., Su, X., & Yao, S. (2022). Can green finance promote green innovation? The moderating effect of environmental regulation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(49), 74540-74553.

Yousaf, Z. (2021). Go for green: green innovation through green dynamic capabilities: accessing the mediating role of green practices and green value co-creation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(39), 54863-54875.

Yousaf, Z., Radulescu, M., Sinisi, C., Nassani, A. A., & Haffar, M. (2022). How do firms achieve green innovation? Investigating the influential factors among the energy sector. Energies, 15(7), 2549.

Yu, C.-H., Wu, X., Zhang, D., Chen, S., & Zhao, J. (2021). Demand for green finance: Resolving financing constraints on green innovation in China. Energy Policy, 153, 112255.

Yu, D., Tao, S., Hanan, A., Ong, T. S., Latif, B., & Ali, M. (2022). Fostering green innovation adoption through green dynamic capability: The moderating role of environmental dynamism and big data analytic capability. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(16), 10336.

Zahid, R., Khurshid, M., & Khan, W. (2022). Do chief executives matter in corporate financial and social responsibility performance nexus? A dynamic model analysis of Chinese firms. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 2420.

Zhai, X., & An, Y. (2020). Analyzing influencing factors of green transformation in China’s manufacturing industry under environmental regulation: A structural equation model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 251, 119760.

Zhang, D., Zhang, Z., & Managi, S. (2019). A bibliometric analysis on green finance: Current status, development, and future directions. Finance Research Letters, 29, 425-430.

Zhang, J., Ouyang, Y., Philbin, S. P., Zhao, X., Ballesteros‐Pérez, P., & Li, H. (2020). Green dynamic capability of construction enterprises: Role of the business model and green production. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(6), 2920-2940.

Zhao, T., Zhou, H., Jiang, J., & Yan, W. (2022). Impact of green finance and environmental regulations on the green innovation efficiency in China. Sustainability, 14(6), 3206.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-03

How to Cite

Shaban, N. ., Afza, T. ., Ehsan, S. ., & Danish, R. Q. . (2024). Leveraging Green Innovation to Foster Sustainable Development through Green Dynamic Capabilities. Research Journal for Societal Issues, 6(3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.56976/rjsi.v6i3.264

Issue

Section

Articles