Analysis of Doctrine of Insanity Defense in English Criminal Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56976/rjsi.v6i1.181Abstract
A person suffering from legal insanity cannot be held responsible for his criminal act. English criminal law recognizes the doctrine of the insanity defense against the criminal responsibility of an accused. The objective of this paper is to study the English law on insanity defense using the doctrinal legal analysis approach. The findings show that English law deals with legal insanity differently than medical insanity. However, the opinion of the medical professionals is mandatory to determine the legal insanity of a person. Furthermore, the standard of evidence to determine legal insanity is the balance of probabilities. English law treats the insanity defense as distinct from the defense of automatism and diminished capacity and the incompetency to stand trial is also dealt with differently than the defense of insanity in English law. English law on the defense of insanity must be interpreted comprehensively by adopting multidisciplinary approaches.
References
Ajmal, A., & Rasool, F. (2023a). Insanity defense in blasphemy offences in Pakistan. Global Social Sciences Review, 8(1), 447-453. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2023(VIII-I).41
Ajmal, A., & Rasool, F. (2023b). Legal analysis of competency to stand trial in Pakistan. Journal of Development and Social Sciences, 4(3), 795-801. http://dx.doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2023(4-III)73
Ajmal, A., Niazi, F. U., & Rasool, F. (2023). Insanity defense in criminal law in India: A critical analysis. Law and Policy Review, 2(2), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.32350/lpr.22.05
Ajmal, A., Rasool, F., & Niazi, F. U. (2023a). Evolution of modern insanity defense: A critical review. Annals of Human and Social Sciences, 4(4), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.35484/ahss.2023(4-IV)06
Ajmal, A., Rasool, F., & Niazi, F. U. (2023b). Insanity defense in US law: A critical analysis. Journal of Development and Social Sciences, 4(4), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.47205/jdss.2023(4-IV)24
Ajmal, A., Rasool, F., & Niazi, F. U. (2023c). Insanity, insanity defense, and the elements of crime: A review. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 7(3), 537–545. https://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2023(7-III)46
Bratty v. A.-G. For Northern Ireland, A.C 386 (1963).
Daniel McNaghten, 10 Clark and Fin. 200, 8 Eng. Rep. 718 (H.L.) (1843).
H.M. Advocate v. Dingwall, 5 Irv 466 (1867).
Hamilton v. Alabama, 368, US 52 (1961).
Mackay, R. (2022). The Insanity Defence in English Law, in Ronnie Mackay, and Warren Brookbanks (eds), The Insanity Defence: International and Comparative Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198854944.003.0002.
Mental Health Act, (2007).
Ormerod, D. & Laird, K. (2021). Smith, Hogan and Ormerod’s Criminal Law (16th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Pollock, F. & Maitland, F. (1898). The History of English Law before the time of Edward 1 (2nd ed.). London: Cambridge University press.
R v. Charlson, 1 All E.R. at P. 859 (1955).
R v. Cooper, EWCA Crim 2335 (2010).
R v. Johnson, EWCA Crim 1978 (2007).
R v. Kemp, 1 Q. B. 399; [1956] 3 All E.R. 249 (1957).
R v. Kopsch, 19 Cr. App. Rep.50 C.A.C. P.51 ((1925)).
R v. Lincolnshire (Kesteven) Justices, I WLR 335 (DC) (1983).
R v. M’Naghten, 8 ER 718 (1843).
R v. Sullivan, AC 156 (1984).
R v. Windle, 2 Q.B.826 (1952).
Ranade, K., Kapoor, A., & Fernandes, T. N. (2022). Mental health law, policy & program in India–A fragmented narrative of change, contradictions and possibilities. SSM-Mental Health, 2, 100174.
Section 1 (2) of Criminal Procedure (Insanity and Unfitness to Plead) Act (1991).
Section 1 of the Criminal Procedure (Insanity and Unfitness to Plead) Act (1991).
Section 1(1) of Criminal Procedure (Insanity and Unfitness to Plead) Act (1991).
Section 2 of Criminal Procedure (Insanity and Unfitness to Plead) Act (1991).
Section 2 of the Homicide Act (1957).
Section 2 of The Trial of Lunatics Act (1883).
Section 2(5) Criminal Procedure (Insanity and Unfitness to Plead) Act (1991).
Section 22 of Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act (2004).
Section 4 of the Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act (1964).
Section 54 (2) of the Mental Health Act (1983).
Section 54 (3) of the Mental Health Act (1983).
Stepleton, 86 C.L.R.358 (1952).
Stevens, R., (2020). Defenses, in Andrew S. Gold, and others (eds), The Oxford Handbook of the New Private Law. Oxford Academic: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780190919665
Witt, J., Hu, Y., & Anacker, L. (2023). Role of expert opinion in an insanity defense. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 51(4) 587-589. https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.230095L1-23
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ali Ajmal, Faiza Rasool
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
