Impact of Institutional Climate on Students’ Learning Capabilities in Universities of Punjab
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56976/rjsi.v5i3.139Abstract
The main objective of the research to find out existing institutional functioning and situation of higher education institutes was to find out and compare the perceptions of teachers and students about institutional climate and its efficiency. The study was descriptive in nature with quantitative approach. Survey method was considered appropriate for collecting the desired data for quantitative study. The tool was prepared to cover the dimensions of planning and management, institutional climate, cost effectiveness, institutional integrity in higher education institutions. While the required data obtained vi questionnaires. The study population include all the students of the higher educational institutions of the Punjab. Stratified sampling was used. The collected data was analyzed quantitively. In quantitative analysis researcher used descriptive statistics, while t-test and correlation were used. results of the study revealed that many factors had great influence for institutional climate like planning and management, integrity of the members of the institute’s environment and cost effectiveness. The study may provide criteria to track the environment and effectiveness of higher education institutions either public or private. Additionally, studies can be conducted on larger scale to maintains/model / standards for the effectiveness of the higher education institutions.
References
Abbasi, A. R., & Mir, G. M. (2012). Impact of teacher’s ability, students’ work ethics and institutional environment on student performance at university of Gujrat. Middle-East Journal of scientific Research, 2(4), 572-579.
Abbasi, M. N., Malik, A., Chaudhry, I. S., & Imdadullah, M. (2011). A study on student satisfaction in Pakistani universities: The case of bahauddin Zakariya university, Pakistan. Asian Social Science, 7(7).17-32. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v7n7p209
Adan, M. Ansari, A. M., and Yasmeen, B. (2022). The Effects of Institutional Environment on Academic Performance at Higher Level of Learning: A Case Study of Punjab University Lahore. Bulletin of Business and Economics, 11(1), 104-112. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6381439
Al-Saadi, K. K. M. (2021). Knowledge Management Processes and their role in Career Creativity “Applied research in the Iraqi Ministry of Trade-State Company for Foodstuff Trade.” Indian Journal of Economics and Business, 20(4).55-70.
Alshawabkeh, R., Rumman, A. A., Al-Abbadi, L., & Abu-Rumman, A. (2020). The intervening role of ambidexterity in the knowledge management project success connection. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 18(3), 56-69.
Benware, C., & Deci, E. (1984). Quality of learning with an active versus passive motivational set. American Educational Research Journal, 21(2), 755-765. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312021004755
Chakraborty, D., & Biswas, W. (2019). Motivating factors in a teacher’s research and developmental activities and their impact on effective quality teaching in higher education institutions. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 12(4), 609–632. https://doi.org/10.1108/jarhe-07-2018-0161
Cortese, A. D. (2003). The critical role of higher education in creating a sustainable future. Planning for Higher Education, 31, 15–22.
Doyle, T. (2023). Helping students learn in a learner-centered environment: A guide to facilitating learning in higher education. Taylor & Francis.
Engin-Demir, C. (2009). Factors influencing the academic achievements of the Turkish urban poor. International Journal of Educational Development, 29(1), 17-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2008.03.003
Gainen, J. (1995). Barriers to success in quantitative gate keeper courses. In J. Gainen, & E. W. Williamson (Eds.), Forstering student in quantitative gateway courses (pp. 5-14). San Francisco: Jossey Bass
Gallagher, S. E., & Savage, T. (2020). Challenge-based learning in higher education: an exploratory literature review. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1863354
Gaston, P. L. (2023). The challenge of Bologna: What United States higher education has to learn from Europe, and why it matters that we learn it. Taylor & Francis.
Gharieb, M. (2021). Critical Appraisal Study of Knowledge Management and its Importance Among Public Sector. International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security, 21(7), 273–283.
Hackett, S., Janssen, J., Beach, P., Perreault, M., Beelen, J., & van Tartwijk, J. (2023). The effectiveness of Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) on intercultural competence development in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00373-3
Ibad, F., & Sharjeel, M. Y. (2021). Evaluation of the professional competency of university faculty members as perceived by higher education students. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v8i1.372
Ismayilova, K., & Bolander Laksov, K. (2023). Teaching creatively in higher education: The roles of personal attributes and environment. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 67(4), 536–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2022.2042732
Khaldi, A., Bouzidi, R., & Nader, F. (2023). Gamification of e-learning in higher education: a systematic literature review. Smart Learning Environments, 10. 25-39.
Lau, L. K. (2003). Institutional factors affecting students’ retention. Education, 124(1), 126-136.
Lazić, Z., Đorđević, A., & Gazizulina, A. (2021). Improvement of quality of higher education institutions as a basis for improvement of quality of life. Sustainability, 13(8), 4149.
Malik, M. E., Danish, R. Q., & Usman, A. (2010). The impact of service quality on students’ satisfaction in higher education institutes of Punjab. Journal of Management Research, 2(2), 1–11.
Qureshi, M. A., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J. A., Raza, S. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2023). Factors affecting students’ learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4), 2371–2391. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1884886
Ramsay ME, et al. The elimination of indigenous measles transmission in England and Wales. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2003;187(Suppl 1):S198–207. doi: 10.1086/368024.
Rasheed, M. I., Aslam, H. D., & Sarwar, S. (2010). Motivational issues for teachers in higher education: A critical case of IUB. Journal of Management Research, 2(2),75-93. https://doi.org/10.5296/jmr.v2i2.349
Rashid, K., & Mukhtar, S. (2012). Education in Pakistan: Problems and their solutions. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2,45-66.
Salvador, R., Barros, M. V., Barreto, B., Pontes, J., Yoshino, R. T., Piekarski, C. M., & de Francisco, A. C. (2022). Challenges and opportunities for problem-based learning in higher education: Lessons from a cross-program industry 4.0 case. Industry and Higher Education, 095042222211003. https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222221100343
Tomlinson, M. (2008). The degree is not enough’: students’ perceptions of the role of higher education credentials for graduate work and employability. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690701737457
Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between Teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning. Higher Education, 37(1), 57-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1003548313194
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Muhammad Dilshad , Farasat Zahra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
