Framing a Cosmopolitan Common Mind Approach for Global Challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56976/rjsi.v6i1.124Abstract
This paper posits and defends a cosmopolitan common mind approach that could be useful for resolving global challenges which cannot be resolved by individuals working independently from one another, such as achieving global peace, cleaning the environment, and improving public health. A ‘cosmopolitan common mind’ refers to intersubjective recognition of some claims across cultures or continents. This account of the cosmopolitan common mind is based on Philip Pettit’s theory of common mind and the standard account of cosmopolitanism. Pettit holds that a common mind is a shared mind. The standard account of cosmopolitanism envisages all human beings as members of the human community. This account is based on three ideals: individualism, egalitarianism, and universalism. A cosmopolitan common mind can direct collective action across cultures or continents to resolve global problems. Terrorism and climate change are global problems that are not the products of individual actions but collective actions. For instance, pollution is created by collective actions. If people all together create pollution, they all together can stop it. The problems of establishing global peace and clean ecology are similar to preventing pollution in that they are beyond the ability of any lone individual to solve. If it is not impossible, we can develop a cosmopolitan common mind to promote the good and stop the bad. In qualitative research methodology, I use the empirically informed philosophical analysis method to documentary resources, including journal papers, academic books, and proceedings of conferences and congresses.
References
Appiah, K. A. (2006). Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers. New York and London: W. W. Norton and Company.
Appiah, K. A. (2017). “Afterword”, in Cosmopolitanisms, ed. Bruce Robbins and Paulo Lemos Horta. New York: New York University Press.
Barry, B. (2010). “International Society from a Cosmopolitan Perspective”, in The Cosmopolitan Reader, ed. Garret Wallace Brown and David Held. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Chesterton, G. K. (2001). Charles Dickens. London: House of Stratus.
Diogenes, L. (1969). Lives of Philosophers, trans. and ed. Caponigri. Chicago: A Gateway Edition-Henry Regnery Company.
Emerson, R. W. (1965). The Journals and Miscellaneous Notebooks of Ralph Waldo Emerson, ed. Merton M. Sealts, Jr. Vol. V. Cambridge and Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Gilbert, M. (2014). Joint Commitment: How We Make the Social World. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Gilbert, M. (2023). Life in Groups: How We Think, Feel and Act Together. Oxford University Press.
Hannerz, U. (1990). “Cosmopolitans and Locals in World Culture”, Theory, Culture and Society 7, no. 1, 239.
Hardin, R. (1982). Collective Action. Baltimore and London: The John Hopkins University Press.
Herder, J. G. (2002). Herder: Philosophical Writings, ed. and trans. Michael N. Forster. Cambridge University Press.
Hume, D. (1960). A Treatise of Hume Nature, Reprinted from the original edition in three volumes, ed. L. A. Selby-Bigge. Great Britain: Oxford at the Clarendon Press.
Martineau, H. (1838). How to Observe Morals and Manners. London: Charles Knight and Co.
Österberg, J. (2019). Towards Reunion in Ethics. Uppsala: Springer.
Pettit, P. (1990). “The Reality of Rule-Following”, Mind 99, no. 393, 15-16.
Pettit, P. (1996). The Common Mind: An Essay on Psychology, Society and Politics. Second edition. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Pettit, P. (2007). “Joining the Dots” in Common Minds: Themes from the Philosophy of Philip Pettit, ed. Geoffrey Brennan, Robert Goodin, Frank Jackson and Michael Smith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pogge, T. (2010). “Cosmopolitanism and Sovereignty” in The Cosmopolitan Reader, ed. Garret Wallace Brown and David Held. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Popper, K. R. (1992). In Search of a Better World. USA and Canada: Routledge.
Popper, K. R. (1994). The Myth of the Framework: In Defence of Science and Rationality, ed. M. A. Notturno. London and New York: Routledge.
Popper, K. R. (2000). Lesson of this Century. London and New York: Routledge
Scanlon, T. M. (2018). Why does Inequality Matter? Oxford University Press.
Sen, A. K. (1977) “Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioural Foundations of Economic Theory”. Philosophy and Public Affairs 6, no. 4: 317-344.
Sen, A. K. (2006). Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny. New York & London: W. W. Norton & Company.
Sen, A. K. (2008). “Violence in Identity”. In Values and Violence: Intangible Aspects of Terrorism, ed. Ibrahim A. Karawan, Wayne McCormack and Stephen E. Reynolds. Springer.
Sen, A. K. (2016). The Country of First Boys. Karachi: Oxford University Press.
Sunstein, C. R. (1995). “Incompletely Theorised Agreements”, Harvard Law Review 108 (7): 1733-1772.
The United Nations Resolution’s General Assembly (2015), Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
Vico, G. (1948). The New Science of Giambattista Vico, trans. Thomas Goddard Bergin and Max Harold Fisch. Ithaca and New York: Cornell University Press.
Waldron, J. (2017). One Another’s Equals: The Basis of Human Equality. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Waldron, J. (2017a). “The Cosmopolitanisms of Citizenship”, in Cosmopolitanisms, ed. Bruce Robbins and Paulo Lemos Horta. New York: New York University Press.
Woolf, V. (1983). Virginia Woolf’s Reading Notebooks, ed. Brenda S. Silver. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Saad Malook
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
